What the strenghs of quantitative imaging ultra sound?

Breast Screening: A Comparison Between Breast Ultrasound and QT Imaging

During breast screening, some women may require a breast ultrasound, especially if they have dense breasts with a high concentration of glandular tissue compared to fat. However, ultrasounds can be time-consuming and require skilled technicians or physicians to perform the scan. They also only provide a fragmented view of the breast.

The Limitations of Breast Ultrasound

Ultrasound scans are not an overview of the entire breast, instead, they provide images in separate pieces. Ultrasounds take more time and can be less comfortable for patients as they require breast compression like mammography.

Introducing QT Imaging: A Newer Technology

A newer technology called QT imaging is gaining popularity, providing high-resolution images that rival MRI without the need for contrast. The procedure is quick and comfortable as it does not require breast compression. QT imaging offers a complete overview of the breast and can even provide reconstructions.

Advantages of QT Imaging

One of the primary advantages of QT imaging over traditional ultrasound is its ability to offer an overall view of the breast instead of separate fragments. Additionally, it is more comfortable for patients as it does not require breast compression like mammography.

Accuracy and Speed

QT imaging has proven to be as accurate as handheld ultrasound and MRI in detecting masses. Furthermore, the procedure is less time-consuming than traditional ultrasound scans.

In conclusion, for women with dense breasts undergoing breast screening, QT imaging offers a more comfortable, quicker, and potentially more accurate alternative to traditional breast ultrasounds.

  • April 23, 2024